Poco C40 vs Vivo Y77 (China)
The Poco C40 (2022) runs on the JLQ, while the Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y77 (China) leads — 29/100 vs 11/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C40 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Poco C40 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y77 (China) doesn't.
Poco C40
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4500 mAh
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 39/100)
- Faster charging: 80W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 194g vs 204g
- Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (57/100 vs 45/100)
Comparing the Poco C40 vs the Vivo Y77 (China), the Vivo Y77 (China) scores 18 points higher (29/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) notably outperforms the Poco C40 (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C40 is a bit better (45/100 vs 39/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (57/100 vs 45/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Poco C40 | Vivo Y77 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | JLQ | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1650 | 1080x2388 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | |
| Brightness (peak) | 400 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 169.6×76.6×9.2 mm | 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 204 g | 194 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Poco C40
- Main: 13MP f/f/2.2
- Front: 5MP
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Poco C40
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C40
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) notably outperforms the Poco C40 (24/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco C40 is a bit better (45/100 vs 39/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (57/100 vs 45/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Poco C40 or the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Vivo Y77 (China) is noticeably better than the Poco C40 — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
What is the rating of the Poco C40 and the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Poco C40 has a MobileRank rating of 11/100, the Vivo Y77 (China) — 29/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C40 or the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Vivo Y77 (China) leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Poco C40 over the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Poco C40 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y77 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.