Poco C65 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $99 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 33/100 (a 54-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 346,495); the Poco C65 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 226g).
Poco C65
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 192g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $99 vs $899
- Better portability (63/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 346495
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 375
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 1031
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 25/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the Poco C65 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 54 points higher (87/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Poco C65 — 50/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (93/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (84/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (81/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C65 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (63/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Poco C65 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G85 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 346495 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 375 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1031 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 / HyperOS | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $99 | $899 |
Poco C65
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Poco C65
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C65
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Poco C65 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Poco C65 by 89.4% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $800. Poco C65 was $800 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (93/100 vs 25/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (84/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (96/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (81/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco C65 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (63/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Poco C65 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 by 54 points (87/100 vs 33/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C65 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Poco C65 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C65 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco C65 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 25/100).
Should you choose the Poco C65 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Poco C65 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.