Poco C65 vs Poco M6
The Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Poco M6 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6100+; launch prices were $99 and $120. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco M6 leads — 40/100 vs 33/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Poco M6 is faster in AnTuTu (513,809 vs 346,495); the Poco C65 has NFC for contactless payments, the Poco M6 doesn't.
Poco C65
Poco M6
- Lighter: 192g vs 195g
- Cheaper at launch: $99 vs $120
- Better portability (63/100 vs 60/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 513809 vs 346495
- Better Geekbench Single: 732 vs 375
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1954 vs 1031
- Higher performance (42/100 vs 25/100)
Comparing the Poco C65 vs the Poco M6, the Poco M6 scores 7 points higher (40/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco M6 leads (42/100 vs 25/100). Value score: Poco C65 — 50/100, Poco M6 — 62/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Poco M6 notably outperforms the Poco C65 (42/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100. In the "portability" category, the Poco C65 and the Poco M6 are nearly equal (63/100 vs 60/100).
| Specification | Poco C65 | Poco M6 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G85 | MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ | |
| AnTuTu | 346495 | 513809 | |
| Geekbench Single | 375 | 732 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1031 | 1954 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 1600x720 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13 / HyperOS | Android 13 / MIUI 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | 600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 195 g | |
| Launch price | $99 | $120 |
Poco C65
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Poco M6
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 5MP
Poco C65
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Poco M6
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Poco C65
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Poco M6
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
We compared Poco C65 and Poco M6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco M6 leads Poco C65 by 32.6% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $21. Poco C65 was $21 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco M6 notably outperforms the Poco C65 (42/100 vs 25/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco C65 and the Poco M6 are nearly equal (63/100 vs 60/100).
Which is better: the Poco C65 or the Poco M6?
The Poco M6 edges out the Poco C65 by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco C65 and the Poco M6?
The Poco C65 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Poco M6 — 40/100.
Which is more powerful: the Poco C65 or the Poco M6?
The Poco M6 leads on performance (42/100 vs 25/100).
Should you choose the Poco C65 over the Poco M6?
The Poco C65 is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco M6 is a better fit for everyday use.