OPPO Reno16 Pro vs Vivo X Fold3

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super, while the Vivo X Fold3 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 74/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 5500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 1,757,044); the OPPO Reno16 Pro is noticeably lighter (188g vs 219g).

The OPPO Reno16 Pro edges out the Vivo X Fold3 by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

OPPO Reno16 Pro

Performance 82
Display 95
Camera 94
Battery 66
Portability 64
Value for money 80

Vivo X Fold3

Performance 76
Display 81
Camera 78
Battery 62
Portability 64
Value for money —

What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 1757044
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 6405 vs 5311
  • Bigger battery: 6700 vs 5500 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 188g vs 219g

  • Higher performance (82/100 vs 76/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 78/100)
  • Longer battery life (66/100 vs 62/100)
  • Better display (95/100 vs 81/100)

What makes Vivo X Fold3 better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 2004 vs 1555

  • Overall rating 74/100

Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro vs the Vivo X Fold3, the OPPO Reno16 Pro scores 9 points higher (83/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (82/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold3 (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Vivo X Fold3 are nearly equal (66/100 vs 62/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 64/100.

OPPO Reno16 Pro: The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo X Fold3: The Vivo X Fold3 is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification OPPO Reno16 Pro Vivo X Fold3
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
AnTuTu 3079298 1757044
Geekbench Single 1555 2004
Geekbench Multi 6405 5311
Display 6.3" AMOLED 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1216x2640 2200x2480
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6700 mAh 5500 mAh
Charging 80W 80W
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 14, OriginOS 4
Brightness (peak) 3600 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69 —
Dimensions 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm 160.0×142.7×4.7 mm
Weight 188 g 219 g
Launch price $600 —

Camera comparison

OPPO Reno16 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera

Vivo X Fold3

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

OPPO Reno16 Pro

  • 6.3" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1216x2640
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
95
display

Vivo X Fold3

  • 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2200x2480
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

OPPO Reno16 Pro

  • 6700 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
66
battery

Vivo X Fold3

  • 5500 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
62
battery

Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro and Vivo X Fold3, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Reno16 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super
83/100
3079298 AnTuTu
Vivo X Fold3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
74/100 -75.3%
1757044 AnTuTu

OPPO Reno16 Pro leads Vivo X Fold3 by 75.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

OPPO Reno16 Pro

$600

Vivo X Fold3

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (82/100 vs 76/100).

display

In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold3 (94/100 vs 78/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Vivo X Fold3 are nearly equal (66/100 vs 62/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 64/100.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Vivo X Fold3?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro edges out the Vivo X Fold3 by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Vivo X Fold3?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Vivo X Fold3 — 74/100.

Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Vivo X Fold3?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 78/100).

Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Vivo X Fold3?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on performance (82/100 vs 76/100).

Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro over the Vivo X Fold3?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X Fold3 is a better fit for active users.