OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $661 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads — 87/100 vs 86/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 3,032,039); the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (205g vs 229g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
Vivo X200 Ultra
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) better?
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 205g vs 229g
- Cheaper at launch: $661 vs $889
- Better camera (94/100 vs 93/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (59/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 3032039
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 2725
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 8932
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 90/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) scores 1 points higher (87/100 vs 86/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 88/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 93/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (83/100 vs 78/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (59/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3032039 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2725 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8932 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.3×76.4×7.7 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | $889 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) by 2.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $228. OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) was $228 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 93/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (83/100 vs 78/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (59/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) edges out the Vivo X200 Ultra by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.