OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs Vivo X Fold3
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Vivo X Fold3 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads — 87/100 vs 74/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,032,039 vs 1,757,044); the Vivo X Fold3 is thinner (4.7mm vs 7.7mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
Vivo X Fold3
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3032039 vs 1757044
- Better Geekbench Single: 2725 vs 2004
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8932 vs 5311
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5500 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 205g vs 219g
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 76/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 78/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 62/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
What makes Vivo X Fold3 better?
- Better portability (64/100 vs 59/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs the Vivo X Fold3, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) scores 13 points higher (87/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (90/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (83/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (90/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Vivo X Fold3 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold3 (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold3 (83/100 vs 62/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold3 is a bit better (64/100 vs 59/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) | Vivo X Fold3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | |
| AnTuTu | 3032039 | 1757044 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2725 | 2004 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8932 | 5311 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 2200x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5500 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.3×76.4×7.7 mm | 160.0×142.7×4.7 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 219 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | — |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X Fold3
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X Fold3
- 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2200x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X Fold3
- 5500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and Vivo X Fold3, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads Vivo X Fold3 by 72.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo X Fold3
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (90/100 vs 76/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Vivo X Fold3 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold3 (94/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold3 (83/100 vs 62/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold3 is a bit better (64/100 vs 59/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Vivo X Fold3?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is noticeably better than the Vivo X Fold3 — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Vivo X Fold3?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Vivo X Fold3 — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Vivo X Fold3?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on camera score (94/100 vs 78/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Vivo X Fold3?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on performance (90/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) over the Vivo X Fold3?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X Fold3 is a better fit for active users.