OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs Vivo S50 Pro mini

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Vivo S50 Pro mini (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; launch prices were $661 and $485. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads — 87/100 vs 79/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,032,039 vs 2,974,201).

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) edges out the Vivo S50 Pro mini by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

Performance 90
Display 84
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 59
Value for money 88

Vivo S50 Pro mini

Performance 90
Display 85
Camera 64
Battery 81
Portability 64
Value for money 80

What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3032039 vs 2974201
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6500 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W

  • Better camera (94/100 vs 64/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 81/100)

What makes Vivo S50 Pro mini better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 2725
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 8932
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
  • Lighter: 191g vs 205g
  • Cheaper at launch: $485 vs $661

  • Better display (85/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (64/100 vs 59/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs the Vivo S50 Pro mini, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) scores 8 points higher (87/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (94/100 vs 64/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 88/100, Vivo S50 Pro mini — 80/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 90/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo S50 Pro mini (94/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Vivo S50 Pro mini are nearly equal (83/100 vs 81/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini is a bit better (64/100 vs 59/100).

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China): The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo S50 Pro mini: The Vivo S50 Pro mini is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) Vivo S50 Pro mini
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
AnTuTu 3032039 2974201
Geekbench Single 2725 2833
Geekbench Multi 8932 9119
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2772x1272 1216x2640
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 6500 mAh
Charging 80W 90W
Wireless charging 50W 40W
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3600 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 161.3×76.4×7.7 mm 150.8×71.8×8.0 mm
Weight 205 g 191 g
Launch price $661 $485

Camera comparison

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

  • Main: 200MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera

Vivo S50 Pro mini

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
64
camera

Display comparison

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1272
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Vivo S50 Pro mini

  • 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1216x2640
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display

Battery and charging

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery

Vivo S50 Pro mini

  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and Vivo S50 Pro mini, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
87/100
3032039 AnTuTu
Vivo S50 Pro mini Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
79/100 -1.9%
2974201 AnTuTu

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads Vivo S50 Pro mini by 1.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

$661

Vivo S50 Pro mini

$485

Launch price difference: $176. Vivo S50 Pro mini was $176 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 90/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo S50 Pro mini (94/100 vs 64/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Vivo S50 Pro mini are nearly equal (83/100 vs 81/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo S50 Pro mini is a bit better (64/100 vs 59/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Vivo S50 Pro mini?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) edges out the Vivo S50 Pro mini by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Vivo S50 Pro mini?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Vivo S50 Pro mini — 79/100.

Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Vivo S50 Pro mini?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on camera score (94/100 vs 64/100).

Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) over the Vivo S50 Pro mini?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo S50 Pro mini is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.