OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4; launch prices were $661 and $320. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads — 87/100 vs 69/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,032,039 vs 2,391,144).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3032039 vs 2391144
- Better Geekbench Single: 2725 vs 2072
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8932 vs 6649
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 205g vs 206g
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 81/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 76/100)
- Better portability (59/100 vs 54/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro better?
- Faster charging: 120W vs 80W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Cheaper at launch: $320 vs $661
- Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) scores 18 points higher (87/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (94/100 vs 35/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 88/100, Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro — 74/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (90/100 vs 81/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro (94/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (83/100 vs 76/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (59/100 vs 54/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) | Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | 3032039 | 2391144 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2725 | 2072 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8932 | 6649 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 4400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 161.3×76.4×7.7 mm | 163.7×75.9×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 206 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | $320 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro by 26.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $341. Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro was $341 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (90/100 vs 81/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro (94/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (83/100 vs 76/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (59/100 vs 54/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is noticeably better than the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on camera score (94/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on performance (90/100 vs 81/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) over the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.