OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs Redmi K80 Ultra

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Redmi K80 Ultra (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+; launch prices were $661 and $350. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads — 87/100 vs 73/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K80 Ultra has the bigger battery (7410 mAh vs 7000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,032,039 vs 2,874,956).

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is noticeably better than the Redmi K80 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

Performance 90
Display 84
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 59
Value for money 88

Redmi K80 Ultra

Performance 89
Display 94
Camera 37
Battery 86
Portability 40
Value for money 80

What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3032039 vs 2874956
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 8932 vs 8430
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 205g vs 219g

  • Higher performance (90/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better portability (59/100 vs 40/100)

What makes Redmi K80 Ultra better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 2729 vs 2725
  • Bigger battery: 7410 vs 7000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $350 vs $661

  • Longer battery life (86/100 vs 83/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs the Redmi K80 Ultra, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) scores 14 points higher (87/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (94/100 vs 37/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 88/100, Redmi K80 Ultra — 80/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Redmi K80 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Redmi K80 Ultra (94/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (86/100 vs 83/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Redmi K80 Ultra (59/100 vs 40/100).

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China): The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Redmi K80 Ultra: The Redmi K80 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) Redmi K80 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500s MediaTek Dimensity 9400+
AnTuTu 3032039 2874956
Geekbench Single 2725 2729
Geekbench Multi 8932 8430
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" OLED
Resolution 2772x1272 1280x2772
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 7410 mAh
Charging 80W 100W
Wireless charging 50W —
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 50 MP 20 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 3600 nits 3200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 161.3×76.4×7.7 mm —
Weight 205 g 219 g
Launch price $661 $350

Camera comparison

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

  • Main: 200MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera

Redmi K80 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
37
camera

Display comparison

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1272
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Redmi K80 Ultra

  • 6.8" OLED
  • Resolution: 1280x2772
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery

Redmi K80 Ultra

  • 7410 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless charging: no data
86
battery

Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and Redmi K80 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
87/100
3032039 AnTuTu
Redmi K80 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9400+
73/100 -5.5%
2874956 AnTuTu

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads Redmi K80 Ultra by 5.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

$661

Redmi K80 Ultra

$350

Launch price difference: $311. Redmi K80 Ultra was $311 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Redmi K80 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Redmi K80 Ultra (94/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (86/100 vs 83/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Redmi K80 Ultra (59/100 vs 40/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Redmi K80 Ultra?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is noticeably better than the Redmi K80 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Redmi K80 Ultra?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Redmi K80 Ultra — 73/100.

Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Redmi K80 Ultra?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on camera score (94/100 vs 37/100).

Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) over the Redmi K80 Ultra?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Redmi K80 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.