OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs Redmi K90 Ultra
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Redmi K90 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $661 and $420. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads — 87/100 vs 73/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K90 Ultra has the bigger battery (8550 mAh vs 7000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Redmi K90 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,233,695 vs 3,032,039); the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (205g vs 227g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
Redmi K90 Ultra
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) better?
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 205g vs 227g
- Better camera (94/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (59/100 vs 40/100)
What makes Redmi K90 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3233695 vs 3032039
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2725
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 8932
- Bigger battery: 8550 vs 7000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Cheaper at launch: $420 vs $661
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 90/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs the Redmi K90 Ultra, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) scores 14 points higher (87/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (94/100 vs 37/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 88/100, Redmi K90 Ultra — 72/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Redmi K90 Ultra (94/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (83/100 vs 78/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Redmi K90 Ultra (59/100 vs 40/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) | Redmi K90 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3032039 | 3233695 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2725 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8932 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 1280x2772 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 8550 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.3×76.4×7.7 mm | 162.9×77.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 227 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | $420 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Redmi K90 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi K90 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2772
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Redmi K90 Ultra
- 8550 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and Redmi K90 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi K90 Ultra leads OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) by 6.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $241. Redmi K90 Ultra was $241 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi K90 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Redmi K90 Ultra (94/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (83/100 vs 78/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Redmi K90 Ultra (59/100 vs 40/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Redmi K90 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is noticeably better than the Redmi K90 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Redmi K90 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Redmi K90 Ultra — 73/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Redmi K90 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on camera score (94/100 vs 37/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) over the Redmi K90 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Redmi K90 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.