Oppo Reno15 Pro (China) vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Oppo Reno15 Pro (China) (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8450, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 82/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 6500); the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 2,016,572); the Oppo Reno15 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (205g vs 226g).
Oppo Reno15 Pro (China)
Vivo X300 Pro
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 205g vs 226g
- Better portability (59/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 2016572
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1608
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 6321
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 77/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 94/100)
Comparing the Oppo Reno15 Pro (China) vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 5 points higher (87/100 vs 82/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 77/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno15 Pro (China) (93/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Oppo Reno15 Pro (China) are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 81/100. In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno15 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (59/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Oppo Reno15 Pro (China) | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8450 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2016572 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1608 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6321 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1272x2772 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×76.5×7.7 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Oppo Reno15 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Oppo Reno15 Pro (China)
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1272x2772
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno15 Pro (China)
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Oppo Reno15 Pro (China) and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Oppo Reno15 Pro (China) by 38.3% in our overall performance rating.
Oppo Reno15 Pro (China)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno15 Pro (China) (93/100 vs 77/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Oppo Reno15 Pro (China) are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 81/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno15 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (59/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Oppo Reno15 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro edges out the Oppo Reno15 Pro (China) by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno15 Pro (China) and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Oppo Reno15 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which is more powerful: the Oppo Reno15 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 77/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno15 Pro (China) over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Oppo Reno15 Pro (China) is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.