Oppo Reno15 (China) vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Oppo Reno15 (China) (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8450, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 79/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 6200); the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 2,016,572); the Oppo Reno15 (China) is noticeably lighter (187g vs 226g).
Oppo Reno15 (China)
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 187g vs 226g
- Better display (85/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (67/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 2016572
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1608
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 6321
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 6200 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 77/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 94/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 64/100)
Comparing the Oppo Reno15 (China) vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 8 points higher (87/100 vs 79/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 77/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno15 (China) (93/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno15 (China) and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Oppo Reno15 (China) are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno15 (China) (81/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno15 (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (67/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Oppo Reno15 (China) | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8450 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2016572 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1608 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6321 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6200 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.0 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 187 g | 226 g | |
| Price | — | $899 |
Oppo Reno15 (China)
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Oppo Reno15 (China)
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno15 (China)
- 6200 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Oppo Reno15 (China) and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Oppo Reno15 (China) by 38.3% in our overall performance rating.
Oppo Reno15 (China)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno15 (China) (93/100 vs 77/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno15 (China) and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Oppo Reno15 (China) are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno15 (China) (81/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno15 (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (67/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Oppo Reno15 (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro edges out the Oppo Reno15 (China) by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno15 (China) and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Oppo Reno15 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which is more powerful: the Oppo Reno15 (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 77/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno15 (China) over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Oppo Reno15 (China) is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.