Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 69/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 1,822,096); the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (183g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) better?
- Lighter: 183g vs 226g
- Better portability (73/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 1822096
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1917
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 4509
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 74/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 19 points higher (88/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) (94/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) (96/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (73/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1822096 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1917 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4509 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14.1 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×74.8×7.6 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 183 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Camera comparison
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) by 45.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) (94/100 vs 74/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) (96/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) (81/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (73/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 74/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.