Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 69/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 1,811,490); the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (183g vs 226g).
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 183g vs 226g
- Better portability (73/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 1811490
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1917
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 4509
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 74/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)
Comparing the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 18 points higher (87/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) (93/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) (96/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (73/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1811490 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1917 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4509 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14.1 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×74.8×7.6 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 183 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) by 44.6% in our overall performance rating.
Oppo Reno12 Pro (China)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) (93/100 vs 74/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) (96/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) (81/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (73/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 74/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Oppo Reno12 Pro (China) is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.