Oppo Reno12 (China) vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Oppo Reno12 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8250, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 66/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Oppo Reno12 (China) is noticeably lighter (179g vs 226g).
Oppo Reno12 (China)
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 179g vs 226g
- Better portability (79/100 vs 43/100)
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (96/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)
Comparing the Oppo Reno12 (China) vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 21 points higher (87/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Oppo Reno12 (China) are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (China) (96/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (China) (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (79/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Oppo Reno12 (China) | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8250 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14.1 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×74.8×7.3 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 226 g | |
| Price | — | $899 |
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Oppo Reno12 (China)
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Oppo Reno12 (China) are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (China) (96/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (China) (81/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (79/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Oppo Reno12 (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (China) by 21 points (87/100 vs 66/100).
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno12 (China) and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Oppo Reno12 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno12 (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 64/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno12 (China) over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Oppo Reno12 (China) is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.