Oppo Reno12 (China) vs Vivo X300s
The Oppo Reno12 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8250, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 66/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Oppo Reno12 (China) is noticeably lighter (179g vs 217g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo Reno12 (China)
Vivo X300s
What makes Oppo Reno12 (China) better?
- Lighter: 179g vs 217g
- Better portability (79/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo X300s better?
- Bigger battery: 7100 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better camera (94/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Oppo Reno12 (China) vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 23 points higher (89/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 56/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (China) (94/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (China) (83/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo X300s (79/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno12 (China) | Vivo X300s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8250 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3703823 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7100 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14.1 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP65 | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×74.8×7.3 mm | — | |
| Weight | 179 g | 217 g | |
| Launch price | — | $723 |
Camera comparison
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300s
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300s
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300s
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oppo Reno12 (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (China) (94/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (China) (83/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo X300s (79/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo Reno12 (China) or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (China) by 23 points (89/100 vs 66/100).
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno12 (China) and the Vivo X300s?
The Oppo Reno12 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno12 (China) or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 64/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno12 (China) over the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.