Oppo Reno12 (China) vs Vivo iQOO 15T
The Oppo Reno12 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8250, while the Vivo iQOO 15T (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads — 82/100 vs 66/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15T has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Oppo Reno12 (China) is noticeably lighter (179g vs 216g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo Reno12 (China)
Vivo iQOO 15T
What makes Oppo Reno12 (China) better?
- Lighter: 179g vs 216g
- Better portability (79/100 vs 44/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15T better?
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better camera (65/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (75/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Oppo Reno12 (China) vs the Vivo iQOO 15T, the Vivo iQOO 15T scores 16 points higher (82/100 vs 66/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (75/100 vs 56/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (China) (99/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T and the Oppo Reno12 (China) are nearly equal (65/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (China) (75/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (79/100 vs 44/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno12 (China) | Vivo iQOO 15T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8250 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 4704310 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14.1 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×74.8×7.3 mm | — | |
| Weight | 179 g | 216 g | |
| Launch price | — | $499 |
Camera comparison
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo iQOO 15T
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15T
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 15T
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oppo Reno12 (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (China) (99/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T and the Oppo Reno12 (China) are nearly equal (65/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (China) (75/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (79/100 vs 44/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo Reno12 (China) or the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Vivo iQOO 15T is noticeably better than the Oppo Reno12 (China) — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno12 (China) and the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Oppo Reno12 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Vivo iQOO 15T — 82/100.
Should you choose the Oppo Reno12 (China) over the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.