Oppo Reno12 (China) vs Vivo X500 Pro
The Oppo Reno12 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8250, while the Vivo X500 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 Pro leads — 90/100 vs 66/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo Reno12 (China)
Vivo X500 Pro
What makes Oppo Reno12 (China) better?
- Lighter: 179g vs 192g
- Better portability (79/100 vs 63/100)
What makes Vivo X500 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better camera (87/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Oppo Reno12 (China) vs the Vivo X500 Pro, the Vivo X500 Pro scores 24 points higher (90/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (87/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (China) (87/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (China) (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X500 Pro (79/100 vs 63/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno12 (China) | Vivo X500 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8250 | MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro | |
| AnTuTu | — | 5016623 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 4188 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 13145 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.4" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1216x2660 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14.1 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×74.8×7.3 mm | 151.8×71.9×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | — | $970 |
Camera comparison
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X500 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X500 Pro
- 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2660
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X500 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oppo Reno12 (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (China) (87/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (China) (81/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X500 Pro (79/100 vs 63/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo Reno12 (China) or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (China) by 24 points (90/100 vs 66/100).
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno12 (China) and the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Oppo Reno12 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Vivo X500 Pro — 90/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno12 (China) or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro leads on camera score (87/100 vs 64/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno12 (China) over the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.