Oppo Reno10 (China) vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Oppo Reno10 (China) (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 59/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 783,606); the Oppo Reno10 (China) is noticeably lighter (180g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo Reno10 (China)
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Oppo Reno10 (China) better?
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Lighter: 180g vs 309g
- Better camera (61/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (82/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (76/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 783606
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1017
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2943
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4600 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 54/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 47/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Oppo Reno10 (China) vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 10 points higher (69/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 54/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 47/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno10 (China) (90/100 vs 54/100). In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno10 (China) is a bit better (82/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno10 (China) is a bit better (61/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Oppo Reno10 (China) (63/100 vs 47/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno10 (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (76/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno10 (China) | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 783606 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1017 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2943 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 950 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 162.4×74.2×7.6 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 180 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Oppo Reno10 (China)
- Main: 64MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 32MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Oppo Reno10 (China)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Oppo Reno10 (China)
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Oppo Reno10 (China) and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Oppo Reno10 (China) by 73.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oppo Reno10 (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno10 (China) (90/100 vs 54/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno10 (China) is a bit better (82/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno10 (China) is a bit better (61/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Oppo Reno10 (China) (63/100 vs 47/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno10 (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (76/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo Reno10 (China) or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Oppo Reno10 (China) — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno10 (China) and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Oppo Reno10 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno10 (China) or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Oppo Reno10 (China) leads on camera score (61/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Oppo Reno10 (China) or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 54/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno10 (China) over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.