OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs Vivo Y300 (China)
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Vivo Y300 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 48/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 524,785); the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y300 (China) doesn't.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Vivo Y300 (China)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 524785
- Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 1980
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 44W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (61/100 vs 54/100)
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs the Vivo Y300 (China), the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 38 points higher (86/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (89/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (89/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (94/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (83/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) is a bit better (61/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | Vivo Y300 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 524785 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2680 | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8358 | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 44W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 163.6×76.2×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | — | 200 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | — |
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo Y300 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
We compared OPPO Reno 16 Pro and Vivo Y300 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Vivo Y300 (China) by 486.8% in our overall performance rating.
Vivo Y300 (China)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (89/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (94/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (83/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y300 (China) is a bit better (61/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) by 38 points (86/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Vivo Y300 (China) — 48/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y300 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.