OPPO Reno 16 FS vs Redmi Turbo 5
The OPPO Reno 16 FS (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy, while the Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra; estimated prices are $549 and $250. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads — 54/100 vs 42/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 6500); the Redmi Turbo 5 is faster in AnTuTu (2,809,170 vs 877,641).
OPPO Reno 16 FS
Redmi Turbo 5
- Lighter: 194g vs 204g
- Better camera (62/100 vs 32/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (57/100 vs 45/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2809170 vs 877641
- Better Geekbench Single: 1553 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6403 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 7560 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Cheaper: $250 vs $549
- Higher performance (43/100 vs 2/100)
- Longer battery life (72/100 vs 54/100)
- Better value for money (93/100 vs 72/100)
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 FS vs the Redmi Turbo 5, the Redmi Turbo 5 scores 12 points higher (54/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (43/100 vs 2/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS leads (62/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (72/100 vs 54/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (93/100 vs 72/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (43/100 vs 2/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (62/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (72/100 vs 54/100). In the "design" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS is a bit better (57/100 vs 45/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (93/100 vs 72/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 FS | Redmi Turbo 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | |
| AnTuTu | 877641 | 2809170 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 1553 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 6403 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2372 | 2756x1268 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 7560 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.2×74.9×8.4 mm | 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | 204 g | |
| Price | $549 | $250 |
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Redmi Turbo 5
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Turbo 5
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2756x1268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Redmi Turbo 5
- 7560 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
We compared OPPO Reno 16 FS and Redmi Turbo 5, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi Turbo 5 leads OPPO Reno 16 FS by 68.8% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $299. Redmi Turbo 5 is cheaper by $299.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (43/100 vs 2/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS significantly outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (62/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (72/100 vs 54/100).
design
In the "design" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS is a bit better (57/100 vs 45/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (93/100 vs 72/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 FS or the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Redmi Turbo 5 is noticeably better than the OPPO Reno 16 FS — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 FS and the Redmi Turbo 5?
The OPPO Reno 16 FS has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 — 54/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 FS or the Redmi Turbo 5?
The OPPO Reno 16 FS leads on camera score (62/100 vs 32/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 FS or the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Redmi Turbo 5 leads on performance (43/100 vs 2/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 FS over the Redmi Turbo 5?
The OPPO Reno 16 FS is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.