OPPO Reno 16 FS vs Redmi K90 Pro Max
The OPPO Reno 16 FS (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy, while the Redmi K90 Pro Max (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $549 and $561. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads — 84/100 vs 42/100 (a 42-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K90 Pro Max has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 6500); the Redmi K90 Pro Max is faster in AnTuTu (4,119,955 vs 877,641); the OPPO Reno 16 FS is noticeably lighter (194g vs 210g).
OPPO Reno 16 FS
Redmi K90 Pro Max
- Lighter: 194g vs 210g
- Cheaper: $549 vs $561
- Better design/ergonomics (57/100 vs 37/100)
- Better value for money (72/100 vs 71/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4119955 vs 877641
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 7560 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 2/100)
- Better camera (74/100 vs 62/100)
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 54/100)
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 FS vs the Redmi K90 Pro Max, the Redmi K90 Pro Max scores 42 points higher (84/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads (94/100 vs 2/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads (74/100 vs 62/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max leads (82/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (94/100 vs 2/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max is a bit better (74/100 vs 62/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (82/100 vs 54/100). In the "design" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS notably outperforms the Redmi K90 Pro Max (57/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS and the Redmi K90 Pro Max are nearly equal (72/100 vs 71/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 FS | Redmi K90 Pro Max | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 877641 | 4119955 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.9" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2372 | 2608x1200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 7560 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.2×74.9×8.4 mm | 163.3×77.8×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | 210 g | |
| Price | $549 | $561 |
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Redmi K90 Pro Max
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi K90 Pro Max
- 6.9" OLED
- Resolution: 2608x1200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Redmi K90 Pro Max
- 7560 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared OPPO Reno 16 FS and Redmi K90 Pro Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi K90 Pro Max leads OPPO Reno 16 FS by 78.7% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $12. OPPO Reno 16 FS is cheaper by $12.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (94/100 vs 2/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max is a bit better (74/100 vs 62/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 Pro Max notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (82/100 vs 54/100).
design
In the "design" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS notably outperforms the Redmi K90 Pro Max (57/100 vs 37/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS and the Redmi K90 Pro Max are nearly equal (72/100 vs 71/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 FS or the Redmi K90 Pro Max?
The Redmi K90 Pro Max significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS by 42 points (84/100 vs 42/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 FS and the Redmi K90 Pro Max?
The OPPO Reno 16 FS has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Redmi K90 Pro Max — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 FS or the Redmi K90 Pro Max?
The Redmi K90 Pro Max leads on camera score (74/100 vs 62/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 FS or the Redmi K90 Pro Max?
The Redmi K90 Pro Max leads on performance (94/100 vs 2/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 FS over the Redmi K90 Pro Max?
The OPPO Reno 16 FS is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi K90 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.