OPPO Reno 16 FS vs Redmi K80 Ultra
The OPPO Reno 16 FS (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy, while the Redmi K80 Ultra (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+; estimated prices are $549 and $350. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K80 Ultra leads — 60/100 vs 42/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K80 Ultra has the bigger battery (7410 mAh vs 6500); the Redmi K80 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,876,004 vs 877,641); the OPPO Reno 16 FS is noticeably lighter (194g vs 219g).
OPPO Reno 16 FS
Redmi K80 Ultra
- Lighter: 194g vs 219g
- Better camera (62/100 vs 32/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (57/100 vs 26/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2876004 vs 877641
- Better Geekbench Single: 2729 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8430 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 7410 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Cheaper: $350 vs $549
- Higher performance (61/100 vs 2/100)
- Longer battery life (72/100 vs 54/100)
- Better value for money (86/100 vs 72/100)
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 FS vs the Redmi K80 Ultra, the Redmi K80 Ultra scores 18 points higher (60/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 2/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS leads (62/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra leads (72/100 vs 54/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 72/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (61/100 vs 2/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS significantly outperforms the Redmi K80 Ultra (62/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (72/100 vs 54/100). In the "design" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS significantly outperforms the Redmi K80 Ultra (57/100 vs 26/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra is a bit better (86/100 vs 72/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 FS | Redmi K80 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | |
| AnTuTu | 877641 | 2876004 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 2729 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 8430 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.8" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2372 | 1280x2772 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 7410 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.2×74.9×8.4 mm | — | |
| Weight | 194 g | 219 g | |
| Price | $549 | $350 |
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Redmi K80 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi K80 Ultra
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1280x2772
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Redmi K80 Ultra
- 7410 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
We compared OPPO Reno 16 FS and Redmi K80 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi K80 Ultra leads OPPO Reno 16 FS by 69.5% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $199. Redmi K80 Ultra is cheaper by $199.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (61/100 vs 2/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS significantly outperforms the Redmi K80 Ultra (62/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (72/100 vs 54/100).
design
In the "design" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS significantly outperforms the Redmi K80 Ultra (57/100 vs 26/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K80 Ultra is a bit better (86/100 vs 72/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 FS or the Redmi K80 Ultra?
The Redmi K80 Ultra is noticeably better than the OPPO Reno 16 FS — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 FS and the Redmi K80 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno 16 FS has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Redmi K80 Ultra — 60/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 FS or the Redmi K80 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno 16 FS leads on camera score (62/100 vs 32/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 FS or the Redmi K80 Ultra?
The Redmi K80 Ultra leads on performance (61/100 vs 2/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 FS over the Redmi K80 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno 16 FS is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi K80 Ultra is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.