OPPO Reno 16 FS vs Redmi Turbo 5 Max
The OPPO Reno 16 FS (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy, while the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s; launch prices were $549 and $300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads — 70/100 vs 61/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 6500); the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is faster in AnTuTu (2,708,482 vs 877,641); the OPPO Reno 16 FS is noticeably lighter (194g vs 219g).
OPPO Reno 16 FS
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- Lighter: 194g vs 219g
- Better camera (64/100 vs 37/100)
- Better portability (58/100 vs 45/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2708482 vs 877641
- Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 9000 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $549
- Higher performance (87/100 vs 55/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 FS vs the Redmi Turbo 5 Max, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max scores 9 points higher (70/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (87/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS leads (64/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (80/100 vs 58/100). Value score: OPPO Reno 16 FS — 42/100, Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 82/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (87/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the OPPO Reno 16 FS are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (64/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (80/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS is a bit better (58/100 vs 45/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 FS | Redmi Turbo 5 Max | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | |
| AnTuTu | 877641 | 2708482 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 2680 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 8358 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2372 | 2772x1280 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 9000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.2×74.9×8.4 mm | 163.0×77.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | 219 g | |
| Launch price | $549 | $300 |
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 9000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
We compared OPPO Reno 16 FS and Redmi Turbo 5 Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads OPPO Reno 16 FS by 67.6% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $249. Redmi Turbo 5 Max was $249 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (87/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the OPPO Reno 16 FS are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (64/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (80/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS is a bit better (58/100 vs 45/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 FS or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max edges out the OPPO Reno 16 FS by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 FS and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The OPPO Reno 16 FS has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 70/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 FS or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The OPPO Reno 16 FS leads on camera score (64/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 FS or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads on performance (87/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 FS over the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The OPPO Reno 16 FS is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.