Oppo Find X7 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $850 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 80/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 2,402,592); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 157); the Vivo X300 Pro is thinner (8.0mm vs 9.5mm).

The Vivo X300 Pro edges out the Oppo Find X7 Ultra by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Performance 83
Display 89
Camera 86
Battery 75
Portability 30
Value for money 72
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Oppo Find X7 Ultra better?
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
  • Lighter: 221g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $850 vs $899

  • Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 2402592
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 2205
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 7192
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 83/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 86/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better portability (43/100 vs 30/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Oppo Find X7 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 7 points higher (87/100 vs 80/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 86/100). Value score: Oppo Find X7 Ultra — 72/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 83/100). In the "display" category, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 86/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 75/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 30/100).

Oppo Find X7 Ultra: The Oppo Find X7 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Oppo Find X7 Ultra Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 2402592 3269794
Geekbench Single 2205 3228
Geekbench Multi 7192 9553
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1440x3168 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 100W 90W
Wireless charging 50W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 157 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 164.3×76.2×9.5 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 221 g 226 g
Launch price $850 $899
Camera comparison
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
86
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 11:41 hrs, total 25:51 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
75
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Oppo Find X7 Ultra and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Oppo Find X7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
80/100
2402592 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +26.5%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Oppo Find X7 Ultra by 26.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
$850
Vivo X300 Pro
$899

Launch price difference: $49. Oppo Find X7 Ultra was $49 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 83/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 86/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 75/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 30/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo Find X7 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro edges out the Oppo Find X7 Ultra by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Oppo Find X7 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 80/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Oppo Find X7 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 86/100).

Which is more powerful: the Oppo Find X7 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 83/100).

Should you choose the Oppo Find X7 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.