Nubia Neo 5 vs OPPO Reno 16 FS
The Nubia Neo 5 (2026) runs on the Unisoc T9300, while the OPPO Reno 16 FS (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 FS leads — 42/100 vs 31/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 FS has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 6050).
Nubia Neo 5
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- Overall rating 31/100
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 6050 mAh
- Higher performance (2/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (62/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (54/100 vs 51/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (57/100 vs 50/100)
- Better value for money (72/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Nubia Neo 5 vs the OPPO Reno 16 FS, the OPPO Reno 16 FS scores 11 points higher (42/100 vs 31/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS leads (62/100 vs 27/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS leads (72/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS and the Nubia Neo 5 are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 5 (62/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS and the Nubia Neo 5 are nearly equal (54/100 vs 51/100). In the "design" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS is a bit better (57/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS notably outperforms the Nubia Neo 5 (72/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Nubia Neo 5 | OPPO Reno 16 FS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T9300 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | |
| AnTuTu | — | 877641 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2813 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 900x1940 | 1080x2372 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6050 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | 1400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68/IP69K | |
| Dimensions | — | 158.2×74.9×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | — | 194 g | |
| Price | — | $549 |
Nubia Neo 5
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Nubia Neo 5
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 900x1940
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nubia Neo 5
- 6050 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Nubia Neo 5
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS and the Nubia Neo 5 are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 5 (62/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS and the Nubia Neo 5 are nearly equal (54/100 vs 51/100).
design
In the "design" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS is a bit better (57/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS notably outperforms the Nubia Neo 5 (72/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Nubia Neo 5 or the OPPO Reno 16 FS?
The OPPO Reno 16 FS is noticeably better than the Nubia Neo 5 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Nubia Neo 5 and the OPPO Reno 16 FS?
The Nubia Neo 5 has a MobileRank rating of 31/100, the OPPO Reno 16 FS — 42/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nubia Neo 5 or the OPPO Reno 16 FS?
The OPPO Reno 16 FS leads on camera score (62/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Nubia Neo 5 over the OPPO Reno 16 FS?
The Nubia Neo 5 is a better fit for everyday use. The OPPO Reno 16 FS is a better fit for everyday use.