Nubia Z50S Pro vs OPPO Reno 16 FS
The Nubia Z50S Pro (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2, while the OPPO Reno 16 FS (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy; estimated prices are $662 and $549. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 FS leads — 42/100 vs 37/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 FS has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5100); the OPPO Reno 16 FS is noticeably lighter (194g vs 228g).
Nubia Z50S Pro
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Overall rating 37/100
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5100 mAh
- Lighter: 194g vs 228g
- Cheaper: $549 vs $662
- Higher performance (2/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (62/100 vs 51/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (57/100 vs 15/100)
- Better value for money (72/100 vs 64/100)
Comparing the Nubia Z50S Pro vs the OPPO Reno 16 FS, the OPPO Reno 16 FS scores 5 points higher (42/100 vs 37/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS leads (62/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS and the Nubia Z50S Pro are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS is a bit better (62/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 54/100. In the "design" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS significantly outperforms the Nubia Z50S Pro (57/100 vs 15/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS is a bit better (72/100 vs 64/100).
| Specification | Nubia Z50S Pro | OPPO Reno 16 FS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | |
| AnTuTu | — | 877641 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2813 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1080x2372 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, MyOS 13 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | 1400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69K | |
| Dimensions | 163.9×76.3×8.3 mm | 158.2×74.9×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 228 g | 194 g | |
| Price | $662 | $549 |
Nubia Z50S Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Nubia Z50S Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nubia Z50S Pro
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Price difference: $113. OPPO Reno 16 FS is cheaper by $113.
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS and the Nubia Z50S Pro are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS is a bit better (62/100 vs 51/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 54/100.
design
In the "design" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS significantly outperforms the Nubia Z50S Pro (57/100 vs 15/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS is a bit better (72/100 vs 64/100).
Which is better: the Nubia Z50S Pro or the OPPO Reno 16 FS?
The OPPO Reno 16 FS edges out the Nubia Z50S Pro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nubia Z50S Pro and the OPPO Reno 16 FS?
The Nubia Z50S Pro has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the OPPO Reno 16 FS — 42/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nubia Z50S Pro or the OPPO Reno 16 FS?
The OPPO Reno 16 FS leads on camera score (62/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the Nubia Z50S Pro over the OPPO Reno 16 FS?
The Nubia Z50S Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The OPPO Reno 16 FS is a better fit for everyday use.