Nothing Phone (3) vs Vivo X200 Ultra

The Nothing Phone (3) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $799 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 76/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5150); the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 2,306,162); the Nothing Phone (3) is noticeably lighter (198g vs 229g).

The Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably better than the Nothing Phone (3) — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nothing Phone (3)
Performance 81
Display 85
Camera 81
Battery 63
Portability 49
Value for money 64
Vivo X200 Ultra
Performance 92
Display 89
Camera 93
Battery 78
Portability 34
Value for money 84
What makes Nothing Phone (3) better?
  • Lighter: 198g vs 229g
  • Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $889

  • Better portability (49/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 2306162
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 2162
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 6847
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5150 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 65W
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better camera (93/100 vs 81/100)
  • Longer battery life (78/100 vs 63/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nothing Phone (3) vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 10 points higher (86/100 vs 76/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Nothing Phone (3) — 64/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 84/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 81/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3) are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (93/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (78/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (3) notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (49/100 vs 34/100).

Nothing Phone (3): The Nothing Phone (3) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Vivo X200 Ultra: The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Nothing Phone (3) Vivo X200 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 2306162 3092340
Geekbench Single 2162 3100
Geekbench Multi 6847 10095
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2800x1260 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5150 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 65W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 167
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 200 MP
Front camera 50 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.0 Android 15 / OriginOS 5
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 160.6×75.6×9.0 mm 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 198 g 229 g
Launch price $799 $889
Camera comparison
Nothing Phone (3)
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.88
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
81
camera
Vivo X200 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
93
camera
Display comparison
Nothing Phone (3)
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display
Vivo X200 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Nothing Phone (3)
  • 5150 mAh
  • Wired: 65W
  • Wireless: 15W
63
battery
Vivo X200 Ultra
  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
78
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nothing Phone (3) and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
76/100
2306162 AnTuTu
Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
86/100 +25.4%
3092340 AnTuTu

Vivo X200 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (3) by 25.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nothing Phone (3)
$799
Vivo X200 Ultra
$889

Launch price difference: $90. Nothing Phone (3) was $90 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 81/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3) are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (93/100 vs 81/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (78/100 vs 63/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (3) notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (49/100 vs 34/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nothing Phone (3) or the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably better than the Nothing Phone (3) — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

What is the rating of the Nothing Phone (3) and the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Nothing Phone (3) has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nothing Phone (3) or the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 81/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nothing Phone (3) or the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 81/100).

Should you choose the Nothing Phone (3) over the Vivo X200 Ultra?

The Nothing Phone (3) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.