Nothing Phone (4a) vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Nothing Phone (4a) (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $349 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 62/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5200); the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 1,148,725); the Nothing Phone (4a) is noticeably lighter (190g vs 229g).
Nothing Phone (4a)
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Lighter: 190g vs 229g
- Cheaper at launch: $349 vs $889
- Better portability (59/100 vs 34/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 1148725
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1237
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 3281
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 50W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 62/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 61/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 54/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
Comparing the Nothing Phone (4a) vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 24 points higher (86/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 62/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 54/100). Value score: Nothing Phone (4a) — 64/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 84/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (92/100 vs 62/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (93/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (78/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (59/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Nothing Phone (4a) | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1148725 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1237 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3281 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2412x1080 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 50W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×77.6×8.6 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $349 | $889 |
Nothing Phone (4a)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Nothing Phone (4a)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2412x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nothing Phone (4a)
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 50W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Nothing Phone (4a) and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (4a) by 62.9% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $540. Nothing Phone (4a) was $540 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (92/100 vs 62/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (93/100 vs 61/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (78/100 vs 54/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (59/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Nothing Phone (4a) or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) by 24 points (86/100 vs 62/100).
What is the rating of the Nothing Phone (4a) and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Nothing Phone (4a) has a MobileRank rating of 62/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nothing Phone (4a) or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 61/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nothing Phone (4a) or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 62/100).
Should you choose the Nothing Phone (4a) over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Nothing Phone (4a) is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.