Nothing Phone (3a) Pro vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $459 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 61/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 1,063,102); the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro is noticeably lighter (201g vs 229g).
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Lighter: 201g vs 229g
- Cheaper at launch: $459 vs $889
- Better portability (54/100 vs 34/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 1063102
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1162
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 3315
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 50W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 60/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 49/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
Comparing the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 25 points higher (86/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 49/100). Value score: Nothing Phone (3a) Pro — 52/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 84/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (92/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (93/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (78/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (54/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1063102 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1162 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3315 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2392x1080 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 50W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.1 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.5×77.5×8.4 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 201 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $459 | $889 |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2392x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 50W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Nothing Phone (3a) Pro and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (3a) Pro by 65.6% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $430. Nothing Phone (3a) Pro was $430 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (92/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (93/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (78/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (54/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro by 25 points (86/100 vs 61/100).
What is the rating of the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Nothing Phone (3a) Pro has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Nothing Phone (3a) Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.