Nothing Phone (2a) vs Vivo X300

The Nothing Phone (2a) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Pro, while the Vivo X300 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $349 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 leads — 82/100 vs 59/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 is faster in AnTuTu (3,330,801 vs 985,261); the Nothing Phone (2a) is noticeably lighter (190g vs 206g).

The Vivo X300 significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) by 23 points (82/100 vs 59/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Nothing Phone (2a)

Performance 58
Display 80
Camera 57
Battery 48
Portability 59
Value for money 52

Vivo X300

Performance 94
Display 84
Camera 78
Battery 69
Portability 55
Value for money 86

What makes Nothing Phone (2a) better?

  • Lighter: 190g vs 206g
  • Cheaper at launch: $349 vs $499

  • Better portability (59/100 vs 55/100)

What makes Vivo X300 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3330801 vs 985261
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3352 vs 1100
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10402 vs 3000
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 45W

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 57/100)
  • Longer battery life (69/100 vs 48/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nothing Phone (2a) vs the Vivo X300, the Vivo X300 scores 23 points higher (82/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 leads (94/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 leads (78/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 leads (69/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Nothing Phone (2a) — 52/100, Vivo X300 — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (94/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 and the Nothing Phone (2a) are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (78/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (69/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (2a) and the Vivo X300 are nearly equal (59/100 vs 55/100).

Vivo X300: The Vivo X300 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Nothing Phone (2a) Vivo X300
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 985261 3330801
Geekbench Single 1100 3352
Geekbench Multi 3000 10402
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2412x1084 2800x1260
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 45W 80W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 14 / Nothing OS 2.5 Android 14
Brightness (peak) 1300 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP54 IP68
Dimensions 161.7×76.3×8.6 mm 150.6×71.9×8.0 mm
Weight 190 g 206 g
Launch price $349 $499

Camera comparison

Nothing Phone (2a)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.88
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
57
camera

Vivo X300

  • Main: 50MP f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Nothing Phone (2a)

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2412x1084
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Vivo X300

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Nothing Phone (2a)

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
48
battery

Vivo X300

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 40W
69
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Nothing Phone (2a) and Vivo X300, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Pro
59/100
985261 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
82/100 +70.4%
3330801 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 leads Nothing Phone (2a) by 70.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Nothing Phone (2a)

$349

Vivo X300

$499

Launch price difference: $150. Nothing Phone (2a) was $150 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (94/100 vs 58/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 and the Nothing Phone (2a) are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (78/100 vs 57/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (69/100 vs 48/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (2a) and the Vivo X300 are nearly equal (59/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Nothing Phone (2a) or the Vivo X300?

The Vivo X300 significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) by 23 points (82/100 vs 59/100).

What is the rating of the Nothing Phone (2a) and the Vivo X300?

The Nothing Phone (2a) has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Vivo X300 — 82/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nothing Phone (2a) or the Vivo X300?

The Vivo X300 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 57/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nothing Phone (2a) or the Vivo X300?

The Vivo X300 leads on performance (94/100 vs 58/100).

Should you choose the Nothing Phone (2a) over the Vivo X300?

The Vivo X300 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.