Nothing Phone (2a) vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The Nothing Phone (2a) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Pro, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $349 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 59/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 985,261); the Nothing Phone (2a) is noticeably lighter (190g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) by 30 points (89/100 vs 59/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Nothing Phone (2a)

Performance 58
Display 80
Camera 57
Battery 48
Portability 59
Value for money 52

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 92

What makes Nothing Phone (2a) better?

  • Lighter: 190g vs 227g
  • Cheaper at launch: $349 vs $799

  • Better portability (59/100 vs 35/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 985261
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1100
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3000
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 57/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 48/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 80/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nothing Phone (2a) vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 30 points higher (89/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Nothing Phone (2a) — 52/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (99/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (99/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (78/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (92/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (2a) notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (59/100 vs 35/100).

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Nothing Phone (2a) Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 985261 4602290
Geekbench Single 1100 3639
Geekbench Multi 3000 11047
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2412x1084 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging 45W 120W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 / Nothing OS 2.5 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1300 nits 8000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP54 IP68
Dimensions 161.7×76.3×8.6 mm 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 190 g 227 g
Launch price $349 $799

Camera comparison

Nothing Phone (2a)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.88
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
57
camera

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Nothing Phone (2a)

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2412x1084
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Nothing Phone (2a)

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
48
battery

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Nothing Phone (2a) and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Pro
59/100
985261 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +78.6%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (2a) by 78.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Nothing Phone (2a)

$349

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

$799

Launch price difference: $450. Nothing Phone (2a) was $450 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (99/100 vs 58/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (99/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (78/100 vs 57/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (92/100 vs 48/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (2a) notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (59/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Nothing Phone (2a) or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) by 30 points (89/100 vs 59/100).

What is the rating of the Nothing Phone (2a) and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Nothing Phone (2a) has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nothing Phone (2a) or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 57/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nothing Phone (2a) or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 58/100).

Should you choose the Nothing Phone (2a) over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.