Nokia XR30 vs ZTE Axon 40 pro
The Nokia XR30 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, while the ZTE Axon 40 pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads — 58/100 vs 46/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 pro has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 64 MP vs 108 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,010,069 vs 592,015).
Nokia XR30
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Overall rating 46/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 1010069 vs 592015
- Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 905
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 2003
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4600 mAh
- Faster charging: 65W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (61/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (44/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 66/100)
Comparing the Nokia XR30 vs the ZTE Axon 40 pro, the ZTE Axon 40 pro scores 12 points higher (58/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads (61/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads (52/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (61/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (89/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro and the Nokia XR30 are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (52/100 vs 37/100).
| Specification | Nokia XR30 | ZTE Axon 40 pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2003 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.7" | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | — | 162.9×72.9×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | — | 199 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Nokia XR30
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Nokia XR30
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Nokia XR30
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia XR30 and ZTE Axon 40 pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 pro leads Nokia XR30 by 41.4% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (61/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (89/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro and the Nokia XR30 are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (52/100 vs 37/100).
Which is better: the Nokia XR30 or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro is noticeably better than the Nokia XR30 — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia XR30 and the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Nokia XR30 has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the ZTE Axon 40 pro — 58/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nokia XR30 or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro leads on performance (61/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Nokia XR30 over the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Nokia XR30 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 pro is a better fit for active users.