Nokia XR30 vs Tecno Pova Curve
The Nokia XR30 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, while the Tecno Pova Curve (2025) runs on the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Pova Curve leads — 58/100 vs 46/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova Curve has the bigger battery (5500 mAh vs 4600); the Tecno Pova Curve is faster in AnTuTu (879,714 vs 592,015).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia XR30
Tecno Pova Curve
What makes Nokia XR30 better?
- Better camera (43/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Tecno Pova Curve better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 879714 vs 592015
- Better Geekbench Single: 1011 vs 905
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2813 vs 2101
- Bigger battery: 5500 vs 4600 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
- Higher performance (55/100 vs 46/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia XR30 vs the Tecno Pova Curve, the Tecno Pova Curve scores 12 points higher (58/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Curve leads (64/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (55/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Curve notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (89/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 and the Tecno Pova Curve are nearly equal (43/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Curve notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (64/100 vs 37/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia XR30 | Tecno Pova Curve | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Dimensity 7300 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | 879714 | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2101 | 2813 | |
| Display | 6.7" | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2436 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 5500 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | — | 164.3×74.6×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | — | 189 g | |
| Launch price | — | $219 |
Camera comparison
Nokia XR30
- Main: 64MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Pova Curve
- Main: 64MP f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
Nokia XR30
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Tecno Pova Curve
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Nokia XR30
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Pova Curve
- 5500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia XR30 and Tecno Pova Curve, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Tecno Pova Curve leads Nokia XR30 by 32.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia XR30
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (55/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Curve notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (89/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 and the Tecno Pova Curve are nearly equal (43/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova Curve notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (64/100 vs 37/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia XR30 or the Tecno Pova Curve?
The Tecno Pova Curve is noticeably better than the Nokia XR30 — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia XR30 and the Tecno Pova Curve?
The Nokia XR30 has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Tecno Pova Curve — 58/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nokia XR30 or the Tecno Pova Curve?
The Tecno Pova Curve leads on performance (55/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Nokia XR30 over the Tecno Pova Curve?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Tecno Pova Curve (64/100 vs 37/100).