Nokia XR30 vs Samsung Galaxy A14
The Nokia XR30 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, while the Samsung Galaxy A14 (2023) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia XR30 leads — 46/100 vs 39/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A14 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A14 is faster in AnTuTu (607,489 vs 592,015).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia XR30
Samsung Galaxy A14
What makes Nokia XR30 better?
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2101 vs 1826
- Faster charging: 33W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (43/100 vs 16/100)
- Better display (66/100 vs 54/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A14 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 607489 vs 592015
- Better Geekbench Single: 960 vs 905
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4600 mAh
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 37/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia XR30 vs the Samsung Galaxy A14, the Nokia XR30 scores 7 points higher (46/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 leads (43/100 vs 16/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 46/100. In the "display" category, the Nokia XR30 is a bit better (66/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (43/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A14 is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia XR30 | Samsung Galaxy A14 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 1330 | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | 607489 | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | 960 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2101 | 1826 | |
| Display | 6.7" | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 67 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, One UI 5 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | — | 167.7×78.0×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | — | 201 g | |
| Launch price | — | $200 |
Camera comparison
Nokia XR30
- Main: 64MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy A14
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
Nokia XR30
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy A14
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Nokia XR30
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A14
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia XR30 and Samsung Galaxy A14, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy A14 leads Nokia XR30 by 2.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia XR30
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 46/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Nokia XR30 is a bit better (66/100 vs 54/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (43/100 vs 16/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A14 is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia XR30 or the Samsung Galaxy A14?
The Nokia XR30 edges out the Samsung Galaxy A14 by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia XR30 and the Samsung Galaxy A14?
The Nokia XR30 has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Samsung Galaxy A14 — 39/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia XR30 or the Samsung Galaxy A14?
The Nokia XR30 leads on camera score (43/100 vs 16/100).
Should you choose the Nokia XR30 over the Samsung Galaxy A14?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is camera — better on the Nokia XR30 (43/100 vs 16/100).