Nokia G310 vs Samsung Galaxy A14
The Nokia G310 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the Samsung Galaxy A14 (2023) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330. Both devices score the same overall rating of 39/100. Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A14 is faster in AnTuTu (607,489 vs 477,542); the Samsung Galaxy A14 has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia G310 doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia G310
Samsung Galaxy A14
What makes Nokia G310 better?
- Faster charging: 20W vs 15W
- Lighter: 195g vs 201g
- Better camera (30/100 vs 16/100)
- Better portability (56/100 vs 46/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A14 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 607489 vs 477542
- Better Geekbench Single: 960 vs 746
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1826 vs 1816
- Higher performance (46/100 vs 41/100)
- Better display (54/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict
The Nokia G310 and the Samsung Galaxy A14 received the same MobileRank rating — 39/100. In the "camera" category, the Nokia G310 leads (30/100 vs 16/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy A14 is a bit better (46/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A14 is a bit better (54/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia G310 is a bit better (30/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100. In the "portability" category, the Nokia G310 is a bit better (56/100 vs 46/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia G310 | Samsung Galaxy A14 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Samsung Exynos 1330 | |
| AnTuTu | 477542 | 607489 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 960 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1816 | 1826 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1612 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 67 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, One UI 5 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 165.1×75.7×8.6 mm | 167.7×78.0×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 201 g | |
| Launch price | — | $200 |
Camera comparison
Nokia G310
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy A14
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
Nokia G310
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A14
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Nokia G310
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A14
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia G310 and Samsung Galaxy A14, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy A14 leads Nokia G310 by 21.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia G310
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy A14 is a bit better (46/100 vs 41/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A14 is a bit better (54/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia G310 is a bit better (30/100 vs 16/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia G310 is a bit better (56/100 vs 46/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia G310 or the Samsung Galaxy A14?
Both devices scored 39/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Samsung Galaxy A14 (46/100 vs 41/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia G310 and the Samsung Galaxy A14?
The Nokia G310 has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the Samsung Galaxy A14 — 39/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia G310 or the Samsung Galaxy A14?
The Nokia G310 leads on camera score (30/100 vs 16/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia G310 or the Samsung Galaxy A14?
The Samsung Galaxy A14 leads on performance (46/100 vs 41/100).
Should you choose the Nokia G310 over the Samsung Galaxy A14?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is camera — better on the Nokia G310 (30/100 vs 16/100).