Nokia G400 vs Samsung Galaxy A14
The Nokia G400 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the Samsung Galaxy A14 (2023) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia G400 leads — 43/100 vs 39/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A14 is faster in AnTuTu (607,137 vs 477,542).
Nokia G400
Samsung Galaxy A14
- Faster charging: 20W vs 15W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 198g vs 201g
- Better camera (33/100 vs 16/100)
- Better display (66/100 vs 54/100)
- Better portability (51/100 vs 46/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 607137 vs 477542
- Better Geekbench Single: 952 vs 746
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1963 vs 1816
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher performance (47/100 vs 41/100)
Comparing the Nokia G400 vs the Samsung Galaxy A14, the Nokia G400 scores 4 points higher (43/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 leads (33/100 vs 16/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy A14 is a bit better (47/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Nokia G400 is a bit better (66/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (33/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100. In the "portability" category, the Nokia G400 is a bit better (51/100 vs 46/100).
| Specification | Nokia G400 | Samsung Galaxy A14 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Samsung Exynos 1330 | |
| AnTuTu | 477542 | 607137 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 952 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1816 | 1963 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 67 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13, One UI 5 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.4×76.7×8.8 mm | 167.7×78.0×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 201 g | |
| Launch price | — | $200 |
Nokia G400
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy A14
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 13MP
Nokia G400
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A14
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia G400
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A14
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia G400 and Samsung Galaxy A14, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy A14 leads Nokia G400 by 21.3% in our overall performance rating.
Nokia G400
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy A14 is a bit better (47/100 vs 41/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Nokia G400 is a bit better (66/100 vs 54/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (33/100 vs 16/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia G400 is a bit better (51/100 vs 46/100).
Which is better: the Nokia G400 or the Samsung Galaxy A14?
The Nokia G400 edges out the Samsung Galaxy A14 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia G400 and the Samsung Galaxy A14?
The Nokia G400 has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Samsung Galaxy A14 — 39/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia G400 or the Samsung Galaxy A14?
The Nokia G400 leads on camera score (33/100 vs 16/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia G400 or the Samsung Galaxy A14?
The Samsung Galaxy A14 leads on performance (47/100 vs 41/100).
Should you choose the Nokia G400 over the Samsung Galaxy A14?
The Nokia G400 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy A14 is a better fit for everyday use.