Nokia G400 vs Samsung Galaxy A03 Core

The Nokia G400 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (2022) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia G400 leads — 43/100 vs 24/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 8 MP; the Nokia G400 is faster in AnTuTu (477,542 vs 153,667); the Nokia G400 has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core doesn't.

The Nokia G400 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia G400
Performance 41
Display 66
Camera 33
Battery 43
Portability 51
Value for money
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
Performance 9
Display 32
Camera 10
Battery 66
Portability 50
Value for money 32
What makes Nokia G400 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 477542 vs 153667
  • Better Geekbench Single: 746 vs 205
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 1816 vs 846
  • Better main camera: 48MP vs 8MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (41/100 vs 9/100)
  • Better camera (33/100 vs 10/100)
  • Better display (66/100 vs 32/100)
  • Better portability (51/100 vs 50/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A03 Core better?
  • Lighter: 196g vs 198g

  • Longer battery life (66/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia G400 vs the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core, the Nokia G400 scores 19 points higher (43/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G400 leads (41/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 leads (33/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core leads (66/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G400 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (41/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Nokia G400 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (66/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (33/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (66/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia G400 and the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100).

Nokia G400: The Nokia G400 is a better fit for everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core: The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia G400 Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G Unisoc SC9863A
AnTuTu 477542 153667
Geekbench Single 746 205
Geekbench Multi 1816 846
Display 6.6" IPS LCD 6.5" IPS LCD
Resolution 1080x2408
Refresh rate 120 Hz 60 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 20W
Main camera 48 MP 8 MP
Ultrawide 5 MP 0 MP
Front camera 16 MP 5 MP
RAM 4GB 2GB
Storage 64GB 32GB
OS Android 12
NFC yes no
Dimensions 166.4×76.7×8.8 mm 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm
Weight 198 g 196 g
Price $100
Camera comparison
Nokia G400
  • Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 16MP
33
camera
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
  • Main: 8MP
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera
Display comparison
Nokia G400
  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2408
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
66
display
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
32
display
Battery and charging
Nokia G400
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 20W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
66
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nokia G400 and Samsung Galaxy A03 Core, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia G400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G
43/100
477542 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core Unisoc SC9863A
24/100 -210.8%
153667 AnTuTu

Nokia G400 leads Samsung Galaxy A03 Core by 210.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Nokia G400
Price unknown
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
$100
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Nokia G400 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (41/100 vs 9/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Nokia G400 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (66/100 vs 32/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (33/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (66/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nokia G400 and the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia G400 or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?

The Nokia G400 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

What is the rating of the Nokia G400 and the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?

The Nokia G400 has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core — 24/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia G400 or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?

The Nokia G400 leads on camera score (33/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nokia G400 or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?

The Nokia G400 leads on performance (41/100 vs 9/100).

Should you choose the Nokia G400 over the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?

The Nokia G400 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a better fit for everyday use.