Nokia G400 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

The Nokia G400 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads — 74/100 vs 43/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Nokia G400 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 477,542); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is thinner (4.5mm vs 8.8mm).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Nokia G400 by 31 points (74/100 vs 43/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Nokia G400

Performance 41
Display 66
Camera 33
Battery 43
Portability 51
Value for money —

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

Performance 98
Display 80
Camera 50
Battery 52
Portability 74
Value for money —

What makes Nokia G400 better?

  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
  • Lighter: 198g vs 201g

  • Overall rating 43/100

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 477542
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 746
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1816
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 20W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 41/100)
  • Better camera (50/100 vs 33/100)
  • Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (80/100 vs 66/100)
  • Better portability (74/100 vs 51/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia G400 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide scores 31 points higher (74/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (98/100 vs 41/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (50/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Nokia G400 (98/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (80/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (50/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (74/100 vs 51/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Nokia G400 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 477542 3950082
Geekbench Single 746 3639
Geekbench Multi 1816 11047
Display 6.6" IPS LCD 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1080x2408 1828x2448
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 4800 mAh
Charging 20W 45W
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 5 MP 50 MP
Front camera 16 MP 10 MP
RAM 4GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 64GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12 Android 17 / One UI 9
Brightness (peak) — 3000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection — IP48
Dimensions 166.4×76.7×8.8 mm 161.4×123.9×4.5 mm
Weight 198 g 201 g
Launch price — —

Camera comparison

Nokia G400

  • Main: 48MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 16MP
33
camera

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 10MP
50
camera

Display comparison

Nokia G400

  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2408
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
66
display

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

  • 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 1828x2448
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Battery and charging

Nokia G400

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 20W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

  • 4800 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
52
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Nokia G400 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia G400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G
43/100
477542 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
74/100 +87.9%
3950082 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Nokia G400 by 87.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Nokia G400 (98/100 vs 41/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (80/100 vs 66/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (50/100 vs 33/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (74/100 vs 51/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Nokia G400 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Nokia G400 by 31 points (74/100 vs 43/100).

What is the rating of the Nokia G400 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Nokia G400 has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 74/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia G400 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on camera score (50/100 vs 33/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nokia G400 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (98/100 vs 41/100).

Should you choose the Nokia G400 over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.