Nokia 8 V 5G UW vs Samsung Galaxy A03 Core

The Nokia 8 V 5G UW (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, while the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (2022) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads — 18/100 vs 13/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 64 MP vs 8 MP; the Nokia 8 V 5G UW is faster in AnTuTu (597,974 vs 153,667); the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is noticeably lighter (196g vs 230g).

The Nokia 8 V 5G UW edges out the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 45
Battery 24
Design 12
Value for money 55
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 0
Battery 36
Design 55
Value for money 100
What makes Nokia 8 V 5G UW better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 597974 vs 153667
  • Better Geekbench Single: 799 vs 205
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 1836 vs 846
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 8MP

  • Better camera (45/100 vs 0/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A03 Core better?
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
  • Lighter: 196g vs 230g

  • Longer battery life (36/100 vs 24/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (55/100 vs 12/100)
  • Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia 8 V 5G UW vs the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW scores 5 points higher (18/100 vs 13/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads (45/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core leads (36/100 vs 24/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (45/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a bit better (36/100 vs 24/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (55/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (100/100 vs 55/100).

Nokia 8 V 5G UW: The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better fit for everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core: The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia 8 V 5G UW Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G Unisoc SC9863A
AnTuTu 597974 153667
Geekbench Single 799 205
Geekbench Multi 1836 846
Display 6.0" IPS LCD 6.5" IPS LCD
Resolution 1080x2400
Refresh rate 60 Hz
Battery 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 18W
Main camera 64 MP 8 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 0 MP
Front camera 24 MP 5 MP
RAM 6GB 2GB
Storage 64GB 32GB
OS Android 10
NFC yes no
Dimensions 171.9×78.6×9.0 mm 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm
Weight 230 g 196 g
Price $100
Camera comparison
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 24MP
45
camera
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
  • Main: 8MP
  • Front: 5MP
0
camera
Display comparison
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
  • 6.0" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: —
0
display
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
0
display
Battery and charging
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
24
battery
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
  • 5000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
36
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nokia 8 V 5G UW and Samsung Galaxy A03 Core, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia 8 V 5G UW Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
18/100
597974 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core Unisoc SC9863A
13/100 -289.1%
153667 AnTuTu

Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads Samsung Galaxy A03 Core by 289.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
Price unknown
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
$100
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (45/100 vs 0/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a bit better (36/100 vs 24/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (55/100 vs 12/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (100/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia 8 V 5G UW or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?

The Nokia 8 V 5G UW edges out the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Nokia 8 V 5G UW and the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?

The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a MobileRank rating of 18/100, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core — 13/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia 8 V 5G UW or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?

The Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads on camera score (45/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Nokia 8 V 5G UW over the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?

The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.