Nokia 8 V 5G UW vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Comparing the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (2020) and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 18/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Longer battery life (24/100 vs 0/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Better camera (81/100 vs 45/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 12/100)
Comparing the Nokia 8 V 5G UW vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 19 points higher (37/100 vs 18/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (81/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (50/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia 8 V 5G UW | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | — | |
| AnTuTu | 597974 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 799 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1836 | — | |
| Display | 6.0" IPS LCD | 6.7" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | — | |
| Charging | 18W | — | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 24 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 15, One UI 7 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.9×78.6×9.0 mm | — | |
| Weight | 230 g | — | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 24MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
- 6.0" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (81/100 vs 45/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (24/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (50/100 vs 12/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia 8 V 5G UW or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is noticeably better than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia 8 V 5G UW and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a MobileRank rating of 18/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia 8 V 5G UW or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 45/100).
Should you choose the Nokia 8 V 5G UW over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.