Nokia X30 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Comparing the Nokia X30 (2022) and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 23/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP.
Nokia X30
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Longer battery life (20/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (68/100 vs 50/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (81/100 vs 33/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
Comparing the Nokia X30 vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 14 points higher (37/100 vs 23/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Nokia X30 leads (20/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Nokia X30 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Nokia X30 (81/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Nokia X30 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (20/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia X30 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (68/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia X30 | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G | — | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2003 | — | |
| Display | 6.4" AMOLED | 6.7" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | — | |
| Charging | 33W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 15, One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 700 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP67 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.9×73.9×8.0 mm | — | |
| Weight | 185 g | — | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia X30
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Nokia X30
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia X30
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Nokia X30 (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Nokia X30 (81/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nokia X30 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (20/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia X30 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (68/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia X30 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is noticeably better than the Nokia X30 — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia X30 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Nokia X30 has a MobileRank rating of 23/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia X30 or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 33/100).
Should you choose the Nokia X30 over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim?
The Nokia X30 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts.