Nokia 2760 Flip vs Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
Comparing the Nokia 2760 Flip (2022) and the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core leads — 13/100 vs 5/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 1450); the main camera is 5 MP vs 8 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is thinner (9.1mm vs 11.5mm).
Nokia 2760 Flip
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- Overall rating 5/100
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 1450 mAh
- Better main camera: 8MP vs 5MP
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (55/100 vs 50/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Nokia 2760 Flip vs the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core scores 8 points higher (13/100 vs 5/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core leads (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a bit better (55/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Nokia 2760 Flip | Samsung Galaxy A03 Core | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Unisoc SC9863A | |
| AnTuTu | — | 153667 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 205 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 846 | |
| Display | 2.8" TFT LCD | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 240x320 | — | |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 1450 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | — | 5 MP | |
| RAM | — | 2GB | |
| Storage | — | 32GB | |
| OS | Kai OS | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 202.1×58.0×11.5 mm | 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | — | 196 g | |
| Price | — | $100 |
Nokia 2760 Flip
- Main: 5MP
- Front: —
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
Nokia 2760 Flip
- 2.8" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 240x320
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Nokia 2760 Flip
- 1450 mAh
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Nokia 2760 Flip
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (36/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a bit better (55/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Nokia 2760 Flip or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core edges out the Nokia 2760 Flip by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia 2760 Flip and the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Nokia 2760 Flip has a MobileRank rating of 5/100, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core — 13/100.
Should you choose the Nokia 2760 Flip over the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Nokia 2760 Flip is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.