Nokia 2760 Flip vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
Comparing the Nokia 2760 Flip (2022) and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (2026) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads — 71/100 vs 5/100 (a 66-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 1450); the main camera is 5 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia 2760 Flip doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is thinner (4.1mm vs 11.5mm).
Nokia 2760 Flip
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 31/100)
- Better value for money (55/100 vs 0/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 1450 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 5MP
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (64/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Nokia 2760 Flip vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra scores 66 points higher (71/100 vs 5/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (64/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nokia 2760 Flip leads (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (64/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia 2760 Flip notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (50/100 vs 31/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nokia 2760 Flip significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (55/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Nokia 2760 Flip | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3942923 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 11033 | |
| Display | 2.8" TFT LCD | 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 240x320 | 1968x2184 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 1450 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 60W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 5 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | — | 10 MP | |
| RAM | — | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | — | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Kai OS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 202.1×58.0×11.5 mm | — | |
| Weight | — | 215 g | |
| Price | — | $2199 |
Nokia 2760 Flip
- Main: 5MP
- Front: —
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Nokia 2760 Flip
- 2.8" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 240x320
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1968x2184
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia 2760 Flip
- 1450 mAh
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
Nokia 2760 Flip
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (92/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (64/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (51/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia 2760 Flip notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (50/100 vs 31/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Nokia 2760 Flip significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (55/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Nokia 2760 Flip or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip by 66 points (71/100 vs 5/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia 2760 Flip and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Nokia 2760 Flip has a MobileRank rating of 5/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia 2760 Flip or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads on camera score (64/100 vs 0/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia 2760 Flip or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Nokia 2760 Flip over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Nokia 2760 Flip is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.