Nokia G42 vs Samsung Galaxy A03 Core

The Nokia G42 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (2022) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A; estimated prices are $150 and $100. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia G42 leads — 39/100 vs 24/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 8 MP; the Nokia G42 is faster in AnTuTu (477,542 vs 153,667); the Nokia G42 has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core doesn't.

The Nokia G42 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia G42
Performance 41
Display 44
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability 57
Value for money 54
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
Performance 9
Display 32
Camera 10
Battery 66
Portability 50
Value for money 32
What makes Nokia G42 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 477542 vs 153667
  • Better Geekbench Single: 746 vs 205
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 1816 vs 846
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 8MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 90Hz vs 60Hz
  • Lighter: 193g vs 196g

  • Higher performance (41/100 vs 9/100)
  • Better camera (30/100 vs 10/100)
  • Better display (44/100 vs 32/100)
  • Better portability (57/100 vs 50/100)
  • Better value for money (54/100 vs 32/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A03 Core better?
  • Cheaper: $100 vs $150

  • Longer battery life (66/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia G42 vs the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core, the Nokia G42 scores 15 points higher (39/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G42 leads (41/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia G42 leads (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core leads (66/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nokia G42 leads (54/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G42 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (41/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Nokia G42 is a bit better (44/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia G42 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core notably outperforms the Nokia G42 (66/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia G42 is a bit better (57/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nokia G42 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (54/100 vs 32/100).

Nokia G42: The Nokia G42 is a better fit for everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core: The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia G42 Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G Unisoc SC9863A
AnTuTu 477542 153667
Geekbench Single 746 205
Geekbench Multi 1816 846
Display 6.6" IPS LCD 6.5" IPS LCD
Resolution 720x1612
Refresh rate 90 Hz 60 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 20W
Main camera 50 MP 8 MP
Front camera 8 MP 5 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB / 8GB 2GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 32GB
OS Android 13, upgradable to Android 14
Brightness (peak) 560 nits
NFC yes no
Dimensions 165.0×75.8×8.6 mm 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm
Weight 193 g 196 g
Price $150 $100
Camera comparison
Nokia G42
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
  • Main: 8MP
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera
Display comparison
Nokia G42
  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1612
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
44
display
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
32
display
Battery and charging
Nokia G42
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 20W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
66
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nokia G42 and Samsung Galaxy A03 Core, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia G42 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G
39/100
477542 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core Unisoc SC9863A
24/100 -210.8%
153667 AnTuTu

Nokia G42 leads Samsung Galaxy A03 Core by 210.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Nokia G42
$150
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
$100

Price difference: $50. Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is cheaper by $50.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Nokia G42 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (41/100 vs 9/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Nokia G42 is a bit better (44/100 vs 32/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Nokia G42 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (30/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core notably outperforms the Nokia G42 (66/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nokia G42 is a bit better (57/100 vs 50/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Nokia G42 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (54/100 vs 32/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia G42 or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?

The Nokia G42 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

What is the rating of the Nokia G42 and the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?

The Nokia G42 has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core — 24/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia G42 or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?

The Nokia G42 leads on camera score (30/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nokia G42 or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?

The Nokia G42 leads on performance (41/100 vs 9/100).

Should you choose the Nokia G42 over the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?

The Nokia G42 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a better fit for everyday use.