Nokia G400 vs Realme GT 2 Pro
The Nokia G400 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the Realme GT 2 Pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme GT 2 Pro leads — 64/100 vs 43/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Realme GT 2 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (1,290,942 vs 477,542).
Nokia G400
Realme GT 2 Pro
- Lighter: 198g vs 199g
- Overall rating 43/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 1290942 vs 477542
- Better Geekbench Single: 1675 vs 746
- Better Geekbench Multi: 4453 vs 1816
- Faster charging: 65W vs 20W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher performance (69/100 vs 41/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (60/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Nokia G400 vs the Realme GT 2 Pro, the Realme GT 2 Pro scores 21 points higher (64/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro leads (69/100 vs 41/100). In the "camera" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro leads (57/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (69/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (57/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro is a bit better (60/100 vs 51/100).
| Specification | Nokia G400 | Realme GT 2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1 | |
| AnTuTu | 477542 | 1290942 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 1675 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1816 | 4453 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.4×76.7×8.8 mm | — | |
| Weight | 198 g | 199 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia G400
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Realme GT 2 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Nokia G400
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Realme GT 2 Pro
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia G400
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
Realme GT 2 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia G400 and Realme GT 2 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Realme GT 2 Pro leads Nokia G400 by 63.0% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (69/100 vs 41/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (57/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Realme GT 2 Pro is a bit better (60/100 vs 51/100).
Which is better: the Nokia G400 or the Realme GT 2 Pro?
The Realme GT 2 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia G400 by 21 points (64/100 vs 43/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia G400 and the Realme GT 2 Pro?
The Nokia G400 has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Realme GT 2 Pro — 64/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia G400 or the Realme GT 2 Pro?
The Realme GT 2 Pro leads on camera score (57/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia G400 or the Realme GT 2 Pro?
The Realme GT 2 Pro leads on performance (69/100 vs 41/100).
Should you choose the Nokia G400 over the Realme GT 2 Pro?
The Nokia G400 is a better fit for everyday use. The Realme GT 2 Pro is a better fit for active users.