Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Xiaomi 17T Pro

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Xiaomi 17T Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1799 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads — 82/100 vs 64/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17T Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4650); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Xiaomi 17T Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,182,664 vs 1,401,321); the Xiaomi 17T Pro is noticeably lighter (205g vs 257g).

The Xiaomi 17T Pro is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

Performance 70
Display 78
Camera 64
Battery 42
Portability 52
Value for money 36

Xiaomi 17T Pro

Performance 93
Display 94
Camera 63
Battery 87
Portability 54
Value for money 76

What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold better?


  • Better camera (64/100 vs 63/100)

What makes Xiaomi 17T Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3182664 vs 1401321
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1707
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 4431
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4650 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 21W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 7W
  • Lighter: 205g vs 257g
  • Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $1799

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 70/100)
  • Longer battery life (87/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better portability (54/100 vs 52/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs the Xiaomi 17T Pro, the Xiaomi 17T Pro scores 18 points higher (82/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads (93/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads (87/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold — 36/100, Xiaomi 17T Pro — 76/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (93/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Xiaomi 17T Pro are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (87/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro and the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100).

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold: The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users.
Xiaomi 17T Pro: The Xiaomi 17T Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Xiaomi 17T Pro
Processor Google Tensor G4 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1401321 3182664
Geekbench Single 1707 3293
Geekbench Multi 4431 10243
Display 8.0" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2076x2152 2772x1280
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4650 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 21W 100W
Wireless charging 7W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 129 —
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 10 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2700 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX8 IP68
Dimensions 155.2×150.2×5.1 mm —
Weight 257 g 205 g
Launch price $1799 $899

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

  • Main: 48MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 10MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
64
camera

Xiaomi 17T Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
63
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

  • 8.0" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2076x2152
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Xiaomi 17T Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1280
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

  • 4650 mAh
  • Wired: 21W
  • Wireless: 7W
42
battery

Xiaomi 17T Pro

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 18:30 hrs, total 36:42 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
87
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and Xiaomi 17T Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4
64/100
1401321 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500
82/100 +56.0%
3182664 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17T Pro leads Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 56.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

$1799

Xiaomi 17T Pro

$899

Launch price difference: $900. Xiaomi 17T Pro was $900 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (93/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Xiaomi 17T Pro are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (87/100 vs 42/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro and the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?

The Xiaomi 17T Pro is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Xiaomi 17T Pro?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Xiaomi 17T Pro — 82/100.

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?

The Xiaomi 17T Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold over the Xiaomi 17T Pro?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users. The Xiaomi 17T Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.