Google Pixel 9 Pro vs Xiaomi 17T Pro

The Google Pixel 9 Pro (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Xiaomi 17T Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $999 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads — 82/100 vs 72/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17T Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4700); the Xiaomi 17T Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,207,005 vs 1,499,601).

The Xiaomi 17T Pro is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Performance 73
Display 88
Camera 80
Battery 50
Portability 54
Value for money 56
Xiaomi 17T Pro
Performance 93
Display 94
Camera 63
Battery 87
Portability 54
Value for money 76
What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro better?
  • Lighter: 199g vs 205g

  • Better camera (80/100 vs 63/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17T Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3207005 vs 1499601
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1880
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 5100
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 37W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 23W
  • Cheaper: $899 vs $999

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 73/100)
  • Longer battery life (87/100 vs 50/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 88/100)
  • Better value for money (76/100 vs 56/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro vs the Xiaomi 17T Pro, the Xiaomi 17T Pro scores 10 points higher (82/100 vs 72/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads (93/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro leads (80/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads (87/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads (76/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro (93/100 vs 73/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17T Pro (80/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro (87/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 54/100. In the "value for money" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro (76/100 vs 56/100).

Google Pixel 9 Pro: The Google Pixel 9 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Xiaomi 17T Pro: The Xiaomi 17T Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 9 Pro Xiaomi 17T Pro
Processor Google Tensor G4 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1499601 3207005
Geekbench Single 1880 3228
Geekbench Multi 5100 9553
Display 6.3" Super Actua LTPO OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2856x1280 2772x1280
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 37W 100W
Wireless charging 23W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 50 MP
Front camera 42 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 152.8×72.0×8.5 mm
Weight 199 g 205 g
Price $999 $899
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 42MP
80
camera
Xiaomi 17T Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
63
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro
  • 6.3" Super Actua LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2856x1280
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display
Xiaomi 17T Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1280
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 9 Pro
  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 37W
  • Wireless: 23W
50
battery
Xiaomi 17T Pro
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 18:30 hrs, total 36:42 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
87
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro and Xiaomi 17T Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4
72/100
1499601 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500
82/100 +53.2%
3207005 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17T Pro leads Google Pixel 9 Pro by 53.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Google Pixel 9 Pro
$999
Xiaomi 17T Pro
$899

Price difference: $100. Xiaomi 17T Pro is cheaper by $100.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro (93/100 vs 73/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17T Pro (80/100 vs 63/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro (87/100 vs 50/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 54/100.

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro (76/100 vs 56/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?

The Xiaomi 17T Pro is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro and the Xiaomi 17T Pro?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 72/100, the Xiaomi 17T Pro — 82/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro leads on camera score (80/100 vs 63/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?

The Xiaomi 17T Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 73/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro over the Xiaomi 17T Pro?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Xiaomi 17T Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.