Nokia G11 vs ZTE Axon 40
The Nokia G11 (2022) runs on the Unisoc T606, while the ZTE Axon 40 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 leads — 58/100 vs 29/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Nokia G11 has the bigger battery (5050 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 is faster in AnTuTu (1,010,069 vs 330,006).
Nokia G11
ZTE Axon 40
- Bigger battery: 5050 vs 5000 mAh
- Lighter: 189g vs 200g
- Better portability (60/100 vs 53/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 1010069 vs 330006
- Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 378
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 1335
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (61/100 vs 27/100)
- Better camera (51/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (73/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the Nokia G11 vs the ZTE Axon 40, the ZTE Axon 40 scores 29 points higher (58/100 vs 29/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (61/100 vs 27/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (51/100 vs 10/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the Nokia G11 (61/100 vs 27/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nokia G11 (73/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the Nokia G11 (51/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia G11 is a bit better (60/100 vs 53/100).
| Specification | Nokia G11 | ZTE Axon 40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T606 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | 330006 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 378 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1335 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.7" | |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5050 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | — | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 164.6×75.9×8.5 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 200 g | |
| Launch price | $149 | — |
Nokia G11
- Main: 13MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 40
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Nokia G11
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
ZTE Axon 40
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia G11
- 5050 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia G11 and ZTE Axon 40, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 leads Nokia G11 by 67.3% in our overall performance rating.
ZTE Axon 40
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the Nokia G11 (61/100 vs 27/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nokia G11 (73/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the Nokia G11 (51/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia G11 is a bit better (60/100 vs 53/100).
Which is better: the Nokia G11 or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the Nokia G11 by 29 points (58/100 vs 29/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia G11 and the ZTE Axon 40?
The Nokia G11 has a MobileRank rating of 29/100, the ZTE Axon 40 — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia G11 or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on camera score (51/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia G11 or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on performance (61/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Nokia G11 over the ZTE Axon 40?
The Nokia G11 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for active users.