Nokia C32 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Nokia C32 (2023) runs on the Unisoc, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 37/100 (a 50-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C32 doesn't; the Nokia C32 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 226g).
Nokia C32
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 199g vs 226g
- Better portability (53/100 vs 43/100)
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (96/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Nokia C32 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 50 points higher (87/100 vs 37/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (84/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (81/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia C32 is a bit better (53/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Nokia C32 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.6×75.9×8.6 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Nokia C32
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Nokia C32
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C32
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Nokia C32
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (84/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (96/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (81/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia C32 is a bit better (53/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Nokia C32 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 by 50 points (87/100 vs 37/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C32 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Nokia C32 has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C32 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C32 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Nokia C32 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.