Nokia C32 vs Vivo iQOO 15T
The Nokia C32 (2023) runs on the Unisoc, while the Vivo iQOO 15T (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads — 82/100 vs 37/100 (a 45-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15T has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15T has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C32 doesn't; the Nokia C32 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 216g).
Nokia C32
Vivo iQOO 15T
- Lighter: 199g vs 216g
- Better portability (53/100 vs 44/100)
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (65/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (75/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Nokia C32 vs the Vivo iQOO 15T, the Vivo iQOO 15T scores 45 points higher (82/100 vs 37/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (65/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (75/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (99/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (65/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (75/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia C32 is a bit better (53/100 vs 44/100).
| Specification | Nokia C32 | Vivo iQOO 15T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3815522 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.6×75.9×8.6 mm | — | |
| Weight | 199 g | 216 g | |
| Launch price | — | $499 |
Nokia C32
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO 15T
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Nokia C32
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO 15T
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Nokia C32
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 15T
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Nokia C32
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (99/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (65/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 (75/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia C32 is a bit better (53/100 vs 44/100).
Which is better: the Nokia C32 or the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Nokia C32 by 45 points (82/100 vs 37/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C32 and the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Nokia C32 has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the Vivo iQOO 15T — 82/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C32 or the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Vivo iQOO 15T leads on camera score (65/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C32 over the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Nokia C32 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.